Post Suggestions or Idea for the Commission

[Yávaros]

Now we are forming the commission, so where can we post suggestions of things for the commission to review? I see a subfolder is set up for them but I do not know if we can post in there.

[Sabastos]

I'd think you could probably post them in the regular charter discussion thread. I'm sure someone would see it.

[Imperator Rex]

This is where any members can post ideas or suggestions about Constitutional Law.

[Marzano]

If you guys plan on making this a multi-use board, you'll need to make some things about the board more generic and use the same idea for the charter.

[Imperator Rex]

I agree. Maybe we should refer to the board as a "Domain." There are a couple of ideas out there for that already. In the NS Region Factbook, we decided a while ago to refer to the regional offsite board as "Unified Regional Board." because of its use by the two regions. Maybe we could use "Unified Domain" or something like that.

[Basileus Romanus]

I have a suggestion! Why don't we use the same process for approving this like before?

[Cardecion]

I was looking through the orginal charter you guys posted for approval and I think there are a couple of things that are repeated throughout the document. You guys should read through the whole thing and then take our the repeats. I think the delegate parts can be listed seperately since the rules of the game can change which means the delegate parts won't apply anymore. I also think the parts about the chancellor's office in one of the last articles kind of contradicts what the law approval process is that was explained in one of the earlier articles. You might want to check that out too.

[Sabastos]

Thanks for your suggestions. I've noticed the same thing.

[Marzano]

I have a couple suggestions about the assent process in chapters 4,5, and 6. I think this process needs to be simpler. The chancellor should be the only one that presents legislation from the assembly to the council. He can veto it by not presenting it to the council. If the assembly reapproves with 2/3 majority, the speaker can present the bill directly to the council for assent. Of course the council can refuse to give assent and that would be a different story. Let's be real here. The chancellery will not meet to discuss things like th council. I don't think appointed ministers should be allowed to have a voice in approving bills. Let the chancellor be a head of government.

That's what I think.

[Letor]

I agree too. I think that the process should be more simple and less complicated.

[Basileus Romanus]

I absolutely positively agree with giving the Chancellor more power! ;D

[Moño]

I like the idea too.

[Adriaticus]

We've been discussing a similar situation with the approvals and the contradictions. Yah, it needs to be simpler. Thanks for the good ideas!