|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Feb 14, 2011 20:10:02 GMT
OK, sab...where did you hide the new charter? I hope you included all the other orders that go with it and updated the sections about the delegate and the ministries.
|
|
|
Post by Sabastos on Feb 15, 2011 18:59:01 GMT
OK ok ok. It's here now! So impatient! And where are the copies of the trust documents you were supposed to load? BTW, I still have to fix a couple of things that both you guys pointed out and I'm not done with the cross refs we talked about. I changed those to a dark red color so they stand out better. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Sabastos on Feb 15, 2011 19:33:51 GMT
Oh by the way...I approve the constitutional canon with some of the minor edits we've been going over.
|
|
|
Post by Imperator Rex on Feb 17, 2011 1:12:04 GMT
I approve it also. I can help you go over the final edit for any syntax, grammar, or spelling errors. I know there were a couple in there that we did not catch. Also...when you download the final version for the poll, be sure you do a PDF since not everyone has access to Word (or the version we started using). And...keep in mind that we may need to delete the attachments to conserve image space. There is a limit on how much space we have for image uploads. Thanks for the hard work you put into this. It is very well done, format and all.
|
|
|
Post by Imperator Rex on Feb 17, 2011 1:17:21 GMT
Hey, Sabastos. Thanks for starting the LP on the deliberations. Make sure you include something about rearranging Art VI. I like how you did that. It coincides with order of how the branches were explained in Art. III.
|
|
|
Post by Sabastos on Feb 19, 2011 18:16:32 GMT
Thanks for the compliments! About the attachment deletions, we have more than enough space. I checked. We have 2,000 Mb and we've only used 6. We're still good. I think we should post the orginal text of the charter just for archive reasons.
|
|
|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Feb 19, 2011 21:24:45 GMT
It's fine. Just make sure you fix some of those spelling errors and update some of the references that are wrong. I like how you arranged article six to be in line with how the branches were listed in the prior article. Looks good. Now off to ratification. And, yah, sab you're right about the attachment space. We don't need to delete anything on these.
|
|
|
Post by Imperator Rex on Feb 22, 2011 2:41:57 GMT
Now this is finally approved. I have the edited version and will post it in the polls for everyone to ratify.
|
|