|
|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Dec 21, 2010 2:26:23 GMT
It looks pretty good. I think section 3a is a little vague and I don't really agree with section 7b. If the chanceller vetos it then it dies. I also think the chancellor should have to power to appoint ministers. Really Roman? Are you serious?? Those are the sections you sent me. All I did was move them in with the other text. If you don't like them then why did you send them to me?  And Rob is right. If you're going to question something you need to be more specific so we can understand what you're whining about.  I'm just screwing with you! ;D Boy, someone needs to go back to anger management classes....  Nah, I read throught it again and it's fine except for that part about imp needing to approve my minister appointments. And I still want the veto power just for me!  But I'll have to live with what's on here...aaaahhh. I think everyone seems ok how about posting it in the polls? |
|
|
|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Dec 21, 2010 2:27:40 GMT
Oh I fogot to add...the delegate should be in the praesidium but not in the founder's council unless the office is held by the chancellor or admin powers are given to the delegate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sabastos on Jan 22, 2011 19:00:03 GMT
The new article six is in the poll for approval. I included all your suggestions the best I could. Let's get this part done so we can have the whole thing approved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Jan 22, 2011 22:38:11 GMT
Looks like you beat me to it. I had something edited that I was thinking about posting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Basileus Romanus on Feb 14, 2011 20:08:18 GMT
I think we can close this one out.
|
|
Nah, I read throught it again and it's fine except for that part about imp needing to approve my minister appointments. And I still want the veto power just for me! 
But I'll have to live with what's on here...aaaahhh.
